Sign In

Don't have a Xilinx account yet?

  • Choose to receive important news and product information
  • Gain access to special content
  • Personalize your web experience on Xilinx.com

Create Account

Username

Password

Forgot your password?
XClose Panel
Xilinx Home
Reply
Visitor
djktp10
Posts: 10
Registered: ‎03-26-2012
0

extra-cost-table and congest design

I have some questions about extra-cost-table for quite a long time, which is:

1. is extra-cost-table (-xt) helpful to kill dense, congest design warning?  (WARNING:Route:464)

2. for a fixed cost-table option (-t), can larger -xt number can get a better PR result? For example, -t=3, -xt=2 is better than -xt=1; and -xt=5 is better than-xt=3?

3. in smartxplorer, -cr option means loop -xt = 0/1/2/3/4/5?

 

Thanks!