- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
ML605 link training fail
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-27-2012 04:21 AM
Re: ML605 link training fail
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-28-2012 08:31 PM
You should be able to find it here:
http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/ml605_
Re: ML605 link training fail
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-29-2012 02:13 AM
Thank you!
I had used the "routed.bit" . It faild , too.
ADD:
X86: SandyBridge, CPU:2520. PCIE-SLOT: 16X, derectly drived by SandyBridge,
Today, when I use insulator to paste on the PCIE finger lane4~lane7, it link success, both gen1xlane4 and gen2xlane4.
Re: ML605 link training fail
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-29-2012 04:27 AM
Are you using the x4 design or the x8 design?
If you're using the x4 design, then you could be running into this known issue:
Re: ML605 link training fail
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-29-2012 03:39 PM
In addition to what luisb suggested, check http://www.xilinx.com/support/answers/42368.htm to debug the issue further.
This AR is for V5 but the principle applies to V6 as well. Also, try by taping off the lanes as described in the AR below:
http://www.xilinx.com/support/answers/38988.htm
Thanks,
DMS
Re: ML605 link training fail
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-30-2012 01:57 AM
dmsxilinx, Thanks!
When I checked http://www.xilinx.com/support/answers/42368.htm to debug the issue, I found that , the RCV_TERM_VTTRX=FALSE.
Anothor, I found that ML605 has sent ST2, but it didn't receive ST2, and it still receive ST1











