Sign In

Don't have a Xilinx account yet?

  • Choose to receive important news and product information
  • Gain access to special content
  • Personalize your web experience on Xilinx.com

Create Account

Username

Password

Forgot your password?
XClose Panel
Xilinx Home
Reply
Regular Visitor
pe-bot
Posts: 19
Registered: ‎07-19-2010
0

Fuse and the "-incremental" argument

I'm using ISE 13.2 and I'm trying to use the -incremental flag for fuse, but it seems to me that it is not working. It will, for example, recompile my gtp ip-core everytime, eventhough it doesn't change between runs. And it takes quite a while to compile.

 

Does anyone else have the same problem?

 

My command line is:

Running: C:\Xilinx\13.2\ISE_DS\ISE\bin\nt64\unwrapped\fuse.exe -lib secureip -incremental -nodebug -o isim/isim_tb.exe -prj isim.prj --rangecheck work.du_interface_tb


 

regards
P

Expert Contributor
gszakacs
Posts: 5,267
Registered: ‎08-14-2007
0

Re: Fuse and the "-incremental" argument

fuse must have become more conservative in release 13.x

 

Using 12.1 I have the opposite problem.  I find that if I use the -incremental switch fuse

will not recompile after I change my test bench unless some underlying modules are

also updated.  So normally I turn this off.  Inability to figure out what needs to be recompiled

seems to be a recurring theme in the ISE tools.

 

-- Gabor

-- Gabor
Regular Visitor
pe-bot
Posts: 19
Registered: ‎07-19-2010
0

Re: Fuse and the "-incremental" argument

Okay, thanks!

 

I'm having a somwhat hard time to understand how this could be that difficult to fix. Looks like they simply disabled the -incremental flag for now, but why not mention it then? I haven't been able to find anything about it in the docs.