- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
ISERDES implementa tion with BUFIO and BUFR-place ment problem
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-21-2010 05:14 AM
Hello All,
I do use ISERDES_NODELY for camera link application. I do have 4 Camera link input blocks, each one has four signal differential pairs inputs and additional input clock differential pair(for each block). Differential clocks drive IBUFGDS, while IBUFGDS single ended output drives BUFIO and BUFR(as suggested in XAPP855) and now the point: I getting a placement error like this:
"Place:728 - I/O component "DVID_CH_3_RXCLK_P" drives BUFIO component
"U1/U1/BUFIO_CH_3" and BUFR component "U1/U1/BUFR_CH_3". The I/O component
must be placed into a clock capable I/O site in the same region as its
load(s). Please make sure such placement is possible.
and like this:
Place:688 - I/O "DVID_CH_3_RXCLK_P" drives the I/O clock buffer (BUFIO)
"U1/U1/BUFIO_CH_3". This I/O must be placed on a clock capable I/O site and
the BUFIO component must be placed on the corresponding BUFIO site. The
following issue has been detected:
Some of the logic associated with this structure is locked. This should cause
the rest of the logic to be locked. A problem was found where we should
place BUFIO U1/U1/BUFIO_CH_3 off the edge of the chip in order to satisfy the
relative placement requirement of this logic.
The errors are related to all my input differential clocks(I posted just an example). I found out that such clocks must be connected to "clock capable" I/Os, in fact they are not connected there, but they are connected to "Global clock" ports. The board is already exixst and just waiting for firmware. I do use Virtex5 XC5VLX50 ff676.
Could somebody help me to figure it out?
Thanks,
Andrey
Re: ISERDES implementa tion with BUFIO and BUFR-place ment problem
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-21-2010 08:46 AM
Can I use a BUFG or BUFC instead of BUFIO?
Re: ISERDES implementa tion with BUFIO and BUFR-place ment problem
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-22-2010 07:38 AM
The following is from the V5 User's Guide, ug190. It indicates you can use a DCM or PLL, and you can drive either of these from the global clock input.
Barry
ISERDES_NODELAY Clocking Methods
Networking Interface Type
The phase relationship of CLK and CLKDIV is important in the serial-to-parallel
conversion process. CLK and CLKDIV are (ideally) phase-aligned within a tolerance.
There are several clocking arrangements within the FPGA to help the design meet the
phase relationship requirements of CLK and CLKDIV. The only valid clocking
arrangements for the ISERDES_NODELAY block using the networking interface type are:
• CLK driven by BUFIO, CLKDIV driven by BUFR
• CLK driven by DCM, CLKDIV driven by the CLKDV output of the same DCM
• CLK driven by PLL, CLKDIV driven by CLKOUT[0:5] of same PLL
Re: ISERDES implementa tion with BUFIO and BUFR-place ment problem
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-22-2010 08:05 AM
Hello Barry,
Thanks for replay. I do not want to use DCM and I sow the options from ug190. The question is what would happen if BUFIO will be changed to BUFG(or BUFCF). BUFIO is definitely faster, but I can not use it. If BUFG and BUFCF are acceptable options, which one is better?
Thanks,
Andrey
Re: ISERDES implementa tion with BUFIO and BUFR-place ment problem
[ Edited ]
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-22-2010 08:13 AM - edited 11-22-2010 08:48 AM
The options listed in Barry's post are the only ones supported. There are other topologies that might work, but I'm afraid you'd be on your own to test and qualify them.
To answer your specific question BUFG would be the one to choose if you can't use the PLL option.
-R
Re: ISERDES implementa tion with BUFIO and BUFR-place ment problem
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-22-2010 09:27 AM
Hi Roy,
Thanks. I have changed BUFIO to BUFG, so now placement has been passed. Hopefully it will work.
Andrey
Re: ISERDES implementa tion with BUFIO and BUFR-place ment problem
[ Edited ]
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-22-2010 09:34 AM - edited 11-22-2010 09:55 AM
You're welcome andreyl,
I feel compelled to be clear about this, though, hopefully is not a good way to go if your designing for a commercial product. I still recommend a PLL so you can say its guaranteed to work and get factory support if it doesn't.
-R
Re: ISERDES implementa tion with BUFIO and BUFR-place ment problem
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-22-2010 10:07 AM
Hi Roy,
Meanwhile I'm facing another problem, but with same relation. Please see error massage below. Using PLL/DCM can help to solve it? ..or there is another solution, to use constrains, but how?
Place:909 - Regional Clock Net "U1/U2/CLK48_TX_CH" cannot possibly be routed to component
"U1/U2/OSERDES_DVID_CH_D20" (placed in clock region "CLOCKREGIONP_X1Y2"), since it is too far away from source BUFR
"U1/U2/BUFR_TX_CH" (placed in clock region "CLOCKREGION_X0Y3"). The situation may be caused by user constraints, or
the complexity of the design. Constraining the components related to the regional clock properly may guide the tool
to find a solution.
To debug your design with partially routed results, please allow map/placer to finish the execution (by setting
environment variable XIL_PAR_DEBUG_IOCLKPLACER to 1).
Thanks,
Andrey
Re: ISERDES implementa tion with BUFIO and BUFR-place ment problem
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-22-2010 10:22 AM
I'm guessing the BUFR is not in the same region as the IO's. A PLL would fix this.
-R











