03-20-2009 12:18 PM - edited 03-20-2009 12:19 PM
03-23-2009 11:00 AM
Is there a reason you don't want to use Microblaze? If you wanted to do a "manual" process you might be better using the lite version in ISE.
03-23-2009 01:00 PM
03-23-2009 01:06 PM
03-23-2009 05:41 PM
I would think that if you don't want to use Microblaze than EDK/SDK would be a waste of time. If you did want to use EDK/SDK it doesn't take a lot of space and it could be useful for passing info and controlling the Ethernet core.
If I go ahead and use Microblaze to control the ethernet core then I will have to control Microblaze using the ARM processor. Then what would be the interface between the ARM processor and Microblaze? I guess I will have to develop a custom control module and this might be more complex.
03-24-2009 06:54 AM
03-24-2009 10:33 AM
03-24-2009 11:33 AM
03-24-2009 12:12 PM