04-17-2019 08:17 AM
look at page 10,
your device has no speed grade , and the numbering looks to me a bit more smudged than I would expect off a new part.
get back to who sold you the part , assuming it was an apporved distributer, they would know.
05-22-2019 03:51 AM
The XC9500XL architectural features address the requirements of in-system programmability. Enhanced pin-locking capability avoids costly board rework. In-system programming throughout the full commercial operating range and a high programming endurance rating provide worry-free reconfigurations of system field upgrades. Extended data retention supports longer and more reliable system operating life.
05-22-2019 04:13 AM
05-22-2019 04:55 AM
It's a direct quote from the XC9500XL datasheet (DS054, page 3) so I would assume that @nathan-31 is a spam-bot trying to get a few posts that don't look like spam before it starts posting spam links. Reported.
With regards to the question: it does seem likely that it's a fake chip. The package marking is nothing like what Xilinx describes in DS056 (datasheet for the XC95144XL).
05-22-2019 05:03 AM
Hi @u4223374 ,
Yes, yesterday I already marked one topic from him as spam.
He is banned now. Thank you for reporting him