cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Highlighted
8,465 Views
Registered: ‎03-22-2013

Vivado unused IOs behavior

Jump to solution

Hello,

 

Is there a way to configure the behavios of unused IOs in Vivado like in ISE?

In ISE: generate programming file/configuration options

-g UnusedPin Unused IOB Pins (Pull Down, Pull Up, Float)

 

 

 

Best regards,

Christian

0 Kudos
1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
Highlighted
Xilinx Employee
Xilinx Employee
11,683 Views
Registered: ‎07-16-2008

Re: Vivado unused IOs behavior

Jump to solution

The equivalent Tcl command is:

set_property BITSTREAM.CONFIG.UNUSEDPIN Pullup [current design]

 

The possible values for the property is Pulldown (default), Pullup and Pullnone.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't forget to reply, kudo, and accept as solution.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

View solution in original post

7 Replies
Highlighted
Xilinx Employee
Xilinx Employee
11,684 Views
Registered: ‎07-16-2008

Re: Vivado unused IOs behavior

Jump to solution

The equivalent Tcl command is:

set_property BITSTREAM.CONFIG.UNUSEDPIN Pullup [current design]

 

The possible values for the property is Pulldown (default), Pullup and Pullnone.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't forget to reply, kudo, and accept as solution.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

View solution in original post

Highlighted
Explorer
Explorer
3,438 Views
Registered: ‎03-23-2015

Re: Vivado unused IOs behavior

Jump to solution

Hello @graces

 

I know this is an old thread but I just wanted a clarifications. Does the BITSTREAM.CONFIG.UNUSEDPIN affect the IOBs only during the device's configuration or does it also affect the unused IOBs after configuration and during normal operation?

 

I would like to know what is the impedance/level on all my unused IOBs but I suspect this parameter is only applicable to configuration time, am I right? If so, what is the actual impendance/level on my unused IOB during normal operation?

 

Thanks.

0 Kudos
Highlighted
Explorer
Explorer
3,412 Views
Registered: ‎03-23-2015

Re: Vivado unused IOs behavior

Jump to solution

Anyone?...

0 Kudos
Highlighted
Visitor
Visitor
3,401 Views
Registered: ‎03-21-2016

Re: Vivado unused IOs behavior

Jump to solution

Hi from experience true for 'run time'..  I have ran performed some experiments and that verified this.

0 Kudos
Highlighted
Moderator
Moderator
3,395 Views
Registered: ‎01-16-2013

Re: Vivado unused IOs behavior

Jump to solution

@arquer,

 

Your query must be related or follow up to this old closed thread but I request you to create a new forum thread for better responses. 

 

--Syed

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kindly note- Please mark the Answer as "Accept as solution" if information provided is helpful.
Give Kudos to a post which you think is helpful and reply oriented.

Did you check our new quick reference timing closure guide (UG1292)?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 Kudos
Highlighted
Explorer
Explorer
3,380 Views
Registered: ‎03-23-2015

Re: Vivado unused IOs behavior

Jump to solution

Thanks @egeek .

 

@syedz, my question IS related to the original thread... so...?

0 Kudos
Highlighted
Moderator
Moderator
3,371 Views
Registered: ‎09-15-2016

Re: Vivado unused IOs behavior

Jump to solution

Hi @arquer,

 

The idea is to create a new thread for your new/follow-up query, as this thread has a solution for it's original post and is resolved - which is like a reference for users with similar issue.

 

Hence it is a best forum practice in such scenarios to create a new post for your query (link this thread for reference) and thus it might get more response towards a resolution.

 

Regards,
prathikm

0 Kudos