UPGRADE YOUR BROWSER

We have detected your current browser version is not the latest one. Xilinx.com uses the latest web technologies to bring you the best online experience possible. Please upgrade to a Xilinx.com supported browser:Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer 11, Safari. Thank you!

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Highlighted
Visitor tianhufei
Visitor
4,155 Views
Registered: ‎09-12-2016

MIG design emperical design regarding addr/cmd fifo and data fifo.

  When I use the example design created by the ip catalog. During simulation, I can see the following:

 

  app_wdf_rdy is 1 about 70% of the time.  app_rdy is 1 about 50% of the time. This means data fifo fills up faster than the cmd/addr fifo. This is a good news though. The only condition given in UG586 is that for a given addr/cmd, the associated data can appear no later than 2 clock cycles.

  The example design uses this strategy.  It first lets the data fifo fill up for 64 data. Then app_wr_en deasserts, and filling up data fifo stops.  The addr fifo continues to fill up as it fills up slower. When the addr has filled up 64 addr/cmd's. app_en deasserts as well. Now we can ensure that both fifos have 64 elements, which associates with each other across fifos.

 

  When I first created the MIG controller. I didn't take into account waiting for the addr/cmd fifo, which could cause an error that some data don't have their corresponding addr.

  

  However, when you select this waiting limit too small. Lets put it to extreme, 1. That is to say I won't write a second data until I have written the addr of the first data. This could be extremely low and the fifos become meaningless here.

 

 So what could be an optimal waiting limit? What kind of factors decide this?

 

 Thank you!

0 Kudos
2 Replies
Xilinx Employee
Xilinx Employee
4,144 Views
Registered: ‎08-01-2008

Re: MIG design emperical design regarding addr/cmd fifo and data fifo.

check this ARs
http://www.xilinx.com/support/answers/34677.html
Thanks and Regards
Balkrishan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please mark the post as an answer "Accept as solution" in case it helped resolve your query.
Give kudos in case a post in case it guided to the solution.
0 Kudos
Xilinx Employee
Xilinx Employee
4,135 Views
Registered: ‎09-20-2012

Re: MIG design emperical design regarding addr/cmd fifo and data fifo.

Hi @tianhufei

 

app_wdf_data data can be pushed even before app_cmd "write command" is asserted. The only condition is that for every app_cmd "write command," the associated app_wdf_data "write data" must be present.

 

You need not wait for first data to be written to data FIFO to send the second command. 

Thanks,
Deepika.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Google your question before posting. If someone's post answers your question, mark the post as answer with "Accept as solution". If you see a particularly good and informative post, consider giving it Kudos (the star on the left)
0 Kudos