UPGRADE YOUR BROWSER

We have detected your current browser version is not the latest one. Xilinx.com uses the latest web technologies to bring you the best online experience possible. Please upgrade to a Xilinx.com supported browser:Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer 11, Safari. Thank you!

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Contributor
Contributor
358 Views
Registered: ‎07-24-2009

Debugging of bad quality link

Hello!

I have bad quality 10Gbps JESD link between ADC and Kintex US. It has a lot of data errors (BER=10^-6..10^-5) and works when DFE is used only. Scrambler is ON in the JESD configuration. I found optimal TX parameters in the ADC (minimal Swing voltage, no de-emphasis)
I made IBERT and found that errors are absent when standard PRBS(7, 15, 23, 31) are used. Open area is in range 700-2200. Then I add RX PRBS checking to my project (with Xilinx JESD / JESD Phy cores) and found PRBS errors. Investigation shows that some internal GTH parameters in the IBERT core differs from JESD Phy. Ok. I change parameters in the JESD Phy (most of them are undocumented and related with CDR, DFE, AGC). Number of error is decreased significantly; PRBS7-16 are clean. But single errors still present with PRBS 23 and 31 (BER=10^-9). Number of errors in JESD data link is decreased to 10^-9..10^-7 (various values on differ lanes)
Is any ideas
1) Why PRBS results differ in the IBERT and my project and both not correspond to data transmission?
2) How to repair link?

PS There is a list of parameters that was changed:
.GTHE3_CHANNEL_ADAPT_CFG0 (16'hf801), // (16'b1111100000000000),
.GTHE3_CHANNEL_ADAPT_CFG1 (16'h0200), // (16'b0000000000000000),
.GTHE3_CHANNEL_RXCDR_CFG0 (16'h2000), // (16'b0000000000000000),
.GTHE3_CHANNEL_RXCDR_CFG2 (16'h07e6), // (16'b0000011101100110),
.GTHE3_CHANNEL_RXCDR_CFG2_GEN3 (16'h07e6), // (16'b0000011111100110),
.GTHE3_CHANNEL_RXCFOK_CFG1 (16'h0165), // (16'b0000000001100101),
.GTHE3_CHANNEL_RXDFELPM_KL_CFG1 (16'h0002), // (16'b0000000000110010),
.GTHE3_CHANNEL_RX_BIAS_CFG0 (16'h0AB4), // (16'b0000101010110100),
.GTHE3_CHANNEL_RX_DFE_AGC_CFG1 (3'h4), // (3'b000),
.GTHE3_CHANNEL_RX_DFE_KL_LPM_KH_CFG1 (3'h4), // (3'b000),
.GTHE3_CHANNEL_RX_DFE_KL_LPM_KL_CFG1 (3'h4), // (3'b000),
.GTHE3_CHANNEL_RX_SUM_IREF_TUNE (4'h0), // (4'b1100),
.GTHE3_CHANNEL_RX_SUM_RES_CTRL (2'h0), //(2'b11),

.GTHE3_COMMON_QPLL0_CFG4 (16'h0009), // (16'b0000000000000000),

0 Kudos
2 Replies
Xilinx Employee
Xilinx Employee
323 Views
Registered: ‎11-29-2007

Re: Debugging of bad quality link

hello,

if the IBERT shows errors but your design has many errors this can be due to 

1) (trivial) we are not using the same RX setup

2) (less trivial) the increased activity in the FPGA due to JESD IP is not supported by a good and well filtered power supply - I would check the power supplies quality

All those listed parameters in your post are reserved and we do not need to set them.

I would rather generate again the JESD PHY and properly fill the "advanced" menu. A very common mistake is to leave default conditions. Please assign a realistic channel loss.

Image 1553269409.png 

 

0 Kudos
Contributor
Contributor
299 Views
Registered: ‎07-24-2009

Re: Debugging of bad quality link

Thank you.

Power voltages are in the valid range and i don't see glitches here. I'll try to perform experiments with insertion loss parameter.