04-10-2019 02:34 AM
I want to scan the eye-diagram of my high speed link.
I tried to use IBERT example design on VC707 board. I have set linerate to 5Gbps
BUT when I test the design near-end-PMA-loopback mode (on my VC707 board) the link state shows 10Gbps:
Why?
I use:
04-15-2019 12:38 AM
I found the problem/solution.
Brief:
Do not modify the line-rate of an IBERT, If you need the change, generate a new example design too.
Reason:
The line-rate cannot be changed of an IBERT, because the constraint file wont updated for the new values. (I dont know if is it a bug or a feature.) So if you dont want to modify the PLL and clock constrains by hand in the *.xdc file open a new example design.
04-10-2019 03:11 AM
Hi @betontalpfa ,
what is your system clock setup and what do you use actually on the board?
04-10-2019 03:43 AM
I have regenerated the project from scratch. And now its working well.
Maybe you, @eschidl, have found the solution.
Here is the Clock Settings of the WRONG desing (These are the default settings)
Here is the Clock Settings of the GOOD design (I switched to use QUAD clock)
Does this system clock measure the actual line rate?
04-10-2019 05:51 AM
Hi @betontalpfa ,
yes, the system clock is used for the measurement.
Good to hear that it is working with the refclk as system clock for you.
I would actually expect both setups to work.
The only thing to try with the SYSCLK pins as system clock would be to divide it down.
The 200MHz system clock is above the DRP limit. So a division is necessary internally.
If that is the problem, you could try to setup the IBERT core with the same pin locations but a frequency of 100MHz. Then in the example design toplevel put a clock divider by 2 between the sysclk pins and the clock input of the IBERT core.
04-12-2019 07:32 AM
Hi @eschidl
I have confused again.
I have set the linerate to 1Gbps (Now I using CPLL because of the slow linerate.)
Now I dont use external system clock. I use the GTREFCLK (of the same quad) as system clock, which is a 125MHz clock.
However, the result is confusing again. I have set (PMA or PCS) near-end loopback, and it shows 2.5Gbps:
I have attached the properties of the common block and the channel.
Why is this mismatch occure?
Can I trust in the MGTREFCLK's 125MHz?
04-15-2019 12:38 AM
I found the problem/solution.
Brief:
Do not modify the line-rate of an IBERT, If you need the change, generate a new example design too.
Reason:
The line-rate cannot be changed of an IBERT, because the constraint file wont updated for the new values. (I dont know if is it a bug or a feature.) So if you dont want to modify the PLL and clock constrains by hand in the *.xdc file open a new example design.