04-13-2018 07:24 AM - edited 04-13-2018 07:30 AM
it is like KCU105,not like KCU105.
the version is Rev C.
However,the kcu105 version is 1.0 and 1.1.
the following board is compliance with KCU105?
04-13-2018 07:28 AM
Looks like an old Kintex Eval Kit, without SODIMM RAM module and SD Card i/f.
04-13-2018 07:40 AM
My guess is that this is a prototype for the KCU105. Version 0.9 It's clearly a board from Xilinx, almost identical to the KC105. If you bought this online, somebody has been naughty at Xilinx.
04-13-2018 07:47 AM - edited 04-13-2018 07:49 AM
the two boards are compliance?
one is from vivado kcu105 snapshot.
the other is from ug917 diagram.
04-13-2018 07:51 AM - edited 04-13-2018 07:54 AM
Assuming this board is functional, it's a KCU105, but with all the bugs that got fixed in version 1.0 and 1.1. Stuff will almost certainly be broken on this card. Only the Xilinx developers will know what these bugs are. It's also possible the device pin connections are different in places. So you can't really trust the documentation for version 1.0. It might be different.
04-13-2018 08:29 AM
You can see the marking Rev C above the KCU105. That is what it is. If those void markings are really on the board then it can't be trusted. You could read the device ID through the jtag port and figure out what level silicon is on it. Use the configuration UG to sort out the device ID. Read the erratas for that silicon version. The down level silicon would likely be the biggest drawback to this board. It is not likely production silicon.