UPGRADE YOUR BROWSER

We have detected your current browser version is not the latest one. Xilinx.com uses the latest web technologies to bring you the best online experience possible. Please upgrade to a Xilinx.com supported browser:Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer 11, Safari. Thank you!

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Observer jmountney
Observer
7,710 Views
Registered: ‎09-30-2014

simulating FFT core 9.0

I have configured an FFT core using Throttle Scheme: Real Time . After simulating the design, I realized that I needed to implement Throttle Scheme: Non Real Time. After changing to Non Real Time, my design simulation suddenly terminates after only 3 clock cycles. This was not the case with Real Time, where it executed for over 1000 clock cycles.

 

The only difference between the two FFT implementations from an instantiation/simulation point is the addition of the I/O signals: m_axis_status_tready, event_data_out_channel_halt and event_status_channel_halt in Non Real Time mode. I do not understand why changing throttle modes would casue the simulation to halt prematurely. Has anyone experienced this behavior before?

0 Kudos
2 Replies
Highlighted
Xilinx Employee
Xilinx Employee
7,701 Views
Registered: ‎08-02-2011

Re: simulating FFT core 9.0

Does the simulator throw an error or anything?
www.xilinx.com
0 Kudos
Teacher muzaffer
Teacher
7,689 Views
Registered: ‎03-31-2012

Re: simulating FFT core 9.0

what happens if you try to run another 100ns ? (ie type run 100ns into the command line?)
- Please mark the Answer as "Accept as solution" if information provided is helpful.
Give Kudos to a post which you think is helpful and reply oriented.
0 Kudos