UPGRADE YOUR BROWSER

We have detected your current browser version is not the latest one. Xilinx.com uses the latest web technologies to bring you the best online experience possible. Please upgrade to a Xilinx.com supported browser:Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer 11, Safari. Thank you!

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Explorer
Explorer
2,917 Views
Registered: ‎08-12-2007

Does MB OSL kernel compiling need glibc 2.11 and 2.4 both for microblaze_v2.0_le?

I first tried to compile it on RHEL4 servers, it reports glibc 2.11 and 2.4 are missing.

I then turned to RHEL5, it reports glibc 2.11 not found.

 

Does this mean both versions are required? How can I make such a platform with both versions installed?

 

Error Message:

microblazeel-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.11' not found (required by microblazeel-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc)

 

0 Kudos
2 Replies
Xilinx Employee
Xilinx Employee
2,909 Views
Registered: ‎09-10-2008

Re: Does MB OSL kernel compiling need glibc 2.11 and 2.4 both for microblaze_v2.0_le?

I have seen that they do need 2.11, I didn't see that they needed both as that doesn't make much sense to me.

 

I don't know of a Xilinx RH machine this will work on as I have only used it on an Ubuntu machine.

 

Sorry.

0 Kudos
Explorer
Explorer
2,905 Views
Registered: ‎08-12-2007

Re: Does MB OSL kernel compiling need glibc 2.11 and 2.4 both for microblaze_v2.0_le?

I found the gcc always use the libc.so.6 in /lib64/tls directory. This is a 64 bit version which doesn't include 2.11.

 

But the 32bit version has 2.11.

 

I tried to set /lib to LD_LIBRARY_PATH, LIBRARY_PATH  and even PATH, none of them changed the library path used by microblazeel-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc.

 

So it comes to a general question: Is there a way to assign library path for kernel compiling?

 

Thanks

Ricky

0 Kudos